Search squid archive

Re: Transparent Proxy on OSX Yosemite

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 31/08/2016 11:19 a.m., Shively, Gregory wrote:
> I'm attempting to get a squid working as a transparent proxy on OSX
> Yosemite. Every attempt ended with a "Forward loop detected". I
> initially started with the version from homebrew and moved to just
> compiling myself to see if I could figure out what was going on.
> Being new to both pf network and squid, it might be something that I
> have configured wrong. I configured pf similar to:
> 
>    nat on $ext_if proto {udp, tcp} from $int_if:network to any port domain -> ($ext_if)
>    rdr pass on $int_if proto tcp from $int_if:network to any port {http, https} -> 127.0.0.1 port 3129
> 
> And my squid.conf for my testing is basically:
> 
> http_port 3128
> http_port 3129 intercept
> http_access allow all
> 

> I'm not sure if this is more appropriate on this mailing list or the
> developer mailing list (hoping it is just something I'm doing wrong).
> The squid that I'm using doesn't have -with-nat-devpf enabled; it
> fails to compile with that option. I'm wondering if the getsockname()
> as per comment for PFIntercept (of the !_USE_NAT_DEVPF) in
> src/ip/Intercept.cc, on OSX is not returning the pre-rdr address and
> causing the forward loop.

Your access.log can show that. It shows up as the server the transaction
is being sent to being port 3128/3129 on 127.0.0.1 or another IP
assigned to the Squid machine.

> 
> As mentioned, the -with-nat-devpf fails to compile on OSX due to a
> missing header file. And from looking it sounds like the header is
> for the ioctl() on /dev/pf, which doesn't seem to be public API on
> OSX. So I'm trying to determine if my issue is due to a
> misconfiguration - or is this portion of the code not working with
> OSX.

It has been a long time since anyone using MacOS has provided any
particular feedback about Squid behaviour on MacOS. So it could be just
bugs when running on MacOS.


> I looked at the code for mitmproxy, and it seems like they
> require a sudoers entry to run "pfctl -s state" and parse the state.
> Would something like that need to be added to squid to support
> transparent proxy on OSX. I had started to put some code together
> like mitmproxy, but thought better check if I didn't get something
> configured correctly.

Squid (when built with the /dev/pf support) master process which is run
as root [you are running Squid from the root account right?] should be
preserving its permission to access the device before it drops down to
low privilege levels for handling the network traffic.

Some other troubleshooting things to try:

* using the machines public IP addres instead of 127.0.0.1. There are
hardware or driver level restrictions on locahost addresses that often
prohibit that type of NAT.

* using a divert-to rule instead of rdr. If your PF firewall accepts
that and the 'tproxy' option in squid.conf works then the /dev/pf is not
relevant. rdr sometimes does not work when divert-to is fine.

* check the PF version in your MacOS. If it derives from OpenBSD 4.8 or
later then the .dev.pf is not relevant - rdr/divert-to failure is then a
bug somewhere AFAIK.


Amos

_______________________________________________
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Samba]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux USB]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux