On 08/23/2016 11:26 AM, Alex Rousskov wrote:
On 08/23/2016 07:59 AM, Marcus Kool wrote:
On 08/23/2016 12:44 AM, Alex Rousskov wrote:
On 08/22/2016 08:14 PM, Marcus Kool wrote:
When I think I am done, I will let you know for a review.
It is best to commit all your intended changes at once (if at all)
rather than to use the public page as a scratch pad -- folks read what
you commit.
I am aware of this and always leave a page in a consistent state.
FWIW, I would aim much higher than consistency. I am waiting for your
signal to start reviewing the already published changes.
ok, I suggest that you review what is done already.
I will publish more but in the area of examples.
BTW, please note that you blanket change of letters SSL to letters TLS
makes wiki diffs nearly useless for review. It is probably too late to
undo that, but please avoid/delay similar non-changes in the future if
you want to facilitate reviews.
The page used a mix of TLS and SSL and I merely made in consistent
by changing the remaining SSL to TLS.
I managed to get 2 CONNECTs to the URL rewriter
Glad I was not imagining things :-).
But the 2 CONNECTs have both an IP address.
The %ssl::>sni macro does not expand in url_rewrite_extras but
expands fine in the logformat of Squid 3.5.20.
Can we call that a bug?
I would. Trunk r14293 (and v3.5 r13913) fixed a similar bug a year ago,
but this may be a separate problem or a regression.
Alex.
_______________________________________________
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
