Search squid archive

Re: Rock store status

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 17/08/16 11:50, FredB wrote:

I tried rock store and smp long time ago (squid 3.2 I guess), Unfortunately I definitely drop smp because there are some limitations (In my case), and I fall-back to diskd because there were many bugs with rock store. FI I also switched to aufs without big differences.

But now with the latest 3.5.20 ? Sadly SMP still not for me but rock store ?

There is someone who are using rock store with a high load, more than 800 r/s, without any problem ? There is a real difference in this situation, cpu, speed, memory ?

We use SMP and Rock under the 3.5 series without problems. But I don't think any of our sites have as high req/sec load as you.

--
 - Steve Hill
   Technical Director
   Opendium    Online Safety / Web Filtering    http://www.opendium.com

   Enquiries                 Support
   ---------                 -------
   sales@xxxxxxxxxxxx        support@xxxxxxxxxxxx
   +44-1792-824568           +44-1792-825748
_______________________________________________
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Samba]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux USB]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux