Hey Steve, Deployed a 3.5.20 build with both of those patches and have noticed a big improvement in memory consumption of squid processes at a couple of splice-heavy sites. Thank you, sir! Dan > On 12 Aug 2016, at 7:05 PM, Steve Hill <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> This sounds very similar to Squid bug 4508. Factory proposed a fix >> for that bug, but the patch is for Squid v4. You may be able to adapt it >> to v3. Testing (with any version) is very welcomed, of course: > > Thanks for that - I'll look into adapting and testing it. > > (been chasing this bug off and on for months - hadn't spotted that there was a bug report open for it :) > > > -- > - Steve Hill > Technical Director > Opendium Limited http://www.opendium.com > > Sales / enquiries: > Email: sales@xxxxxxxxxxxx > Phone: +44-1792-824568 / sip:sales@xxxxxxxxxxxx > > Support: > Email: support@xxxxxxxxxxxx > Phone: +44-1792-825748 / sip:support@xxxxxxxxxxxx > _______________________________________________ > squid-users mailing list > squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users _______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
