On 15/08/2016 11:33 p.m., John Akhaice wrote: > Hi Amos. > > Thank you for your reply. > > I upgraded to 3.5.20. > However, as you thought, the result is not changed. > > I'm using squid for an explicit proxy. > >> How did you have it working in 3.1? It should not have worked any >> differently then either. > > I'm sorry but I realized that my colleague had applied a patch long time > ago. > > The patch he found was located in the following. > http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3025 > Maybe, the patch was not committed, I think. > > I have to make and apply a same effect patch on squid-3.5.20. > If you could make the patch, that would be great. Sure. Not sure how that one slipped through the cracks. It should have been merged years ago. Amos _______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users