On 19/07/2016 5:50 p.m., Omid Kosari wrote: > Also i have seen that another guy did successfully something like that (not > exactly ) in this thread > http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/cache-peer-hit-miss-and-reject-td4661928.html > No. Niki's ACLs had nothing to do with HTTP reply state. The external ACL helper stored and used *request URL* information. The first request for any URL was a fixed value, only the second or later values varied based on the externally stored knowledge. It never predicts anything variable in advance, and never used reply headers. Amos _______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
