Hi all, I am trying to configure a second squid proxy as an intercept proxy but this time under FreeBSD instead of OpenBSD. Doing my first tests I have a problem with acl's that I don't understand. To isolate the problem, I have started with a simple squid.conf file: # # Recommended minimum configuration: # # Example rule allowing access from your local networks. # Adapt to list your (internal) IP networks from where browsing # should be allowed acl localnet src 10.0.0.0/8 # RFC1918 possible internal network acl localnet src 172.16.0.0/12 # RFC1918 possible internal network acl localnet src 192.168.0.0/16 # RFC1918 possible internal network acl localnet src fc00::/7 # RFC 4193 local private network range acl localnet src fe80::/10 # RFC 4291 link-local (directly plugged) machines acl SSL_ports port 443 acl Safe_ports port 80 # http acl Safe_ports port 21 # ftp acl Safe_ports port 443 # https acl Safe_ports port 70 # gopher acl Safe_ports port 210 # wais acl Safe_ports port 1025-65535 # unregistered ports acl Safe_ports port 280 # http-mgmt acl Safe_ports port 488 # gss-http acl Safe_ports port 591 # filemaker acl Safe_ports port 777 # multiling http acl CONNECT method CONNECT # # Recommended minimum Access Permission configuration: # # Deny requests to certain unsafe ports http_access deny !Safe_ports # Deny CONNECT to other than secure SSL ports http_access deny CONNECT !SSL_ports # Only allow cachemgr access from localhost http_access allow localhost manager http_access deny manager # We strongly recommend the following be uncommented to protect innocent # web applications running on the proxy server who think the only # one who can access services on "localhost" is a local user #http_access deny to_localhost # # INSERT YOUR OWN RULE(S) HERE TO ALLOW ACCESS FROM YOUR CLIENTS # # Example rule allowing access from your local networks. # Adapt localnet in the ACL section to list your (internal) IP networks # from where browsing should be allowed http_access allow localnet http_access allow localhost # And finally deny all other access to this proxy http_access deny all # Squid normally listens to port 3128 http_port 3128 http_port 127.0.0.1:5144 intercept # Uncomment and adjust the following to add a disk cache directory. #cache_dir ufs /var/squid/cache 100 16 256 # Leave coredumps in the first cache dir coredump_dir /var/squid/cache # # Add any of your own refresh_pattern entries above these. # refresh_pattern ^ftp: 1440 20% 10080 refresh_pattern ^gopher: 1440 0% 1440 refresh_pattern -i (/cgi-bin/|\?) 0 0% 0 refresh_pattern . 0 20% 4320 As you can see, I have configured only one port for intercept http requests ... I have configured new PF rules in this new FreeBSD host: rdr pass on $vpnif proto tcp from $int_network to any port http tag intlans-to-inet -> lo0 port 5144 .. And the result is: 1467122773.928 0 127.0.0.1 TCP_MISS/403 4357 GET http://www.osnews.com/ - HIER_NONE/- text/html 1467122773.928 35 172.22.55.1 TCP_MISS/403 4489 GET http://www.osnews.com/ - ORIGINAL_DST/127.0.0.1 text/html 1467122774.068 0 172.22.55.1 TCP_MEM_HIT/200 13096 GET http://fbsdprx.my.domain.com:3128/squid-internal-static/icons/SN.png - HIER_NONE/- image/png 1467122774.102 0 127.0.0.1 TCP_MISS/403 4314 GET http://www.osnews.com/favicon.ico - HIER_NONE/- text/html 1467122774.103 2 172.22.55.1 TCP_MISS/403 4446 GET http://www.osnews.com/favicon.ico - ORIGINAL_DST/127.0.0.1 text/html .. What is the problem?? Are ACL's wrong?? Why?? At first stage, I was thinking about a problem with the pf rules ... but, now, I am not sure because packets arrives to squid ... Any idea?? Thanks. -- Greetings, C. L. Martinez _______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
