|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 By the way, I do not care that there is the relevance of porn sites. Rummage in this shit and check I somehow do not want to. I am satisfied that blocked most of which are my users trying to surf. 17.06.2016 3:11, Benjamin E. Nichols пишет: > > > > On 6/16/2016 3:28 PM, Yuri Voinov wrote: > I propose to nominate for the second place of the contest "The most > inefficient use of computing resources - 2016." :-!:-D > > Because first place already occuped. :-D 30 millions pornsites in one > squid's ACL and 7 minutes for squid -k refresh. 8-) > > Yeah and Ill bet about 27 Million of them are dead, expired, parked or redirected because your list sucks. > > > If you really intend to use blacklists tailored for Squid proxy Native ACL, we are the leading and only provider of such lists. > > And we actually query each domain daily with batch updates, dead domains are placed into a holding pool to be queried again cyclically and re added > > as necessary. > > > Shallalist is a joke, urlblacklist is garbage, if you are serious and need a better blacklist, we would be happy to serve you. > > > > 17.06.2016 1:20, Antony Stone пишет: > >>> On Thursday 16 June 2016 at 21:11:50, Alfredo Rezinovsky wrote: > >>> > >>>> Well.. I tried. > >>>> I need to ban 8613 URLs. Because a law. > >>> Have you considered https://www.urlfilterdb.com/products/ufdbguard.html ? > >>> > >>>> If I put one per line in a file and set the filename for an url_regex acl > >>>> it works. But when the traffic goes up the cpu load goes 100% (even using > >>>> workers) and the proxy turns unusable. > >>> Er, I'm not surprised. > >>> > >>>> I tested and saw my squid can't parse regexes with more than 8192 > >>>> characters. > >>>> I managed to combine the 8000 uris in 34 regexes using a ruby gem, > and the > >>>> cpu load stays almost at the same level it is without any acl (same > >>>> traffic). > >>> That must be *way* past anything to be described as "maintainable". > >>> > >>>> the regex is: > >>> Er, thanks, that confirms my suspicions above :) > >>> > >>> > >>> Antony. > >>> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> squid-users mailing list >> squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users > > -- > Signed, > > Benjamin E. Nichols > http://www.squidblacklist.org > > 1-405-397-1360 > > > _______________________________________________ > squid-users mailing list > squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJXY69LAAoJENNXIZxhPexGzbsH/Rjx5G5vP41dPwXAYGqyTEMP g5uwVn5RLzEB1DOQZBnGp9uSQb9R1ZelNLitUocFdDYZcE9WNbSxrXMl7TfQLgor UPje/vmONcxLGeNmpgiFQh/qnTouhtwjUN9v/cd55mNOa1KplrRVU9BlucGnzK+1 x9z0icdR3dfS+49LCPiEArysCFnxfINIaKAkYDBGZ4ovdjtegSY0amnG98VI01+J j9PEeeumjAHI8xn3BgwuAaEZI/B9iPM3LBQRbMkjNfhBbvRqc0/iVLGJiZpjUGSf Zo4S0BI4kT6p7OzRGqCZZyqLxyNm/_onmPvTpW55ZEaeKZMUVaN0MMVtnXynD2lI_= =Mkgm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Attachment:
0x613DEC46.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
_______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
