On 8/04/2016 1:23 a.m., Amos Jeffries wrote: > On 7/04/2016 1:42 a.m., joe wrote: >> yes >> >> FredB wrote >>>> >>>> Attached is a patch which I think will fix 3.5.16 (should apply fine >>>> on >>>> 4.0.8 too) without needing the cache reset. Anyone able to test it >>>> please? >>>> >>> >>> Reset the cache still needed, at least in my case >>> > > Hmm. I'm not sure why that reset would be needed. I just ran a series of > tests with detailed debugging of the vary details being loaded from disk > and it seems the last patch was correctly erasing the \0 terminators > (and they were wrongly being stored). > > So at least this new regression is fixed. Anything else seen in Vary is > a separate bug. > > FYI Ralf reported bug 4481 to track it. I have updated the bug with an > explanation of the issue and applied that last patch to Squid-4 now. It > should be in 3.5 in a day or two. > And for those following this thread instead of bugzilla that 3.5 patch is now up at <http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v3/3.5/changesets/squid-3.5-14022.patch> Amos _______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
