On 18/03/2016 7:45 a.m., Heiler Bemerguy wrote: > > Shouldn't this be something like HIT_ABORTED? There's no header asking > if it's modified or to refresh/reload.. (but I really aborted it) > The request contains "Cache-Control: no-cache". -> it should actually be a MISS. The response also contains only header for heuristic caching. For some reason related to your unknown config settings the proxy is disobeying the "no-cache" and using its cached copy. The heuristics are also deciding that its old enough to need revalidating. Amos > Tested a zillion times... > > Connecting to: au.v4.download.windowsupdate.com (via 10.1.10.9) > > !!!! ----Header Sent---- >>>>> GET > http://au.v4.download.windowsupdate.com/c/msdownload/update/software/secu/2016/02/windows8.1-kb3139929-x64_bc45682a716526a1de3c920886312049db868a0d.psf > HTTP/1.1 > Host: au.v4.download.windowsupdate.com > Range: bytes=0- > Accept: */* > Accept-Encoding: > Pragma: no-cache > Cache-Control: no-cache > > !!!! ----Header Recv---- > HTTP/1.1 206 Partial Content > Content-Type: application/octet-stream > Accept-Ranges: bytes > Server: Microsoft-IIS/7.5 > X-Powered-By: ASP.NET > Last-Modified: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 19:54:57 GMT > ETag: "80be8c3c3d6fd11:0" > Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 18:40:50 GMT > X-CCC: BR > X-CID: 2 > Age: 212 > X-Cache: HIT from proxy > Connection: keep-alive > Content-Range: bytes 0-387131056/387131057 > Content-Length: 387131057 > > Best Regards, > _______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
