On 03/16/2016 02:21 AM, joe wrote: > You need to direct messages to the service(s) using adaptation_access > directives: > isn't faster if we use gzip library instead that will minimize the redirect > ms..direct decompress Virtually everything would be faster if done directly in Squid. The processing speed is not the primary acceptance criteria, or we would never have ICAP, eCAP, URL rewriters, authentication helpers, SSL certificate validators, and other "helpers". Compressing and uncompressing content on-the-fly is a lot more difficult than adding a couple of zlib function calls. It probably also requires several configuration/tuning options to accommodate various deployment environments. To make it worth implementing inside Squid, decompression has to be a very frequent feature request OR it has to be nearly impossible to do well outside of Squid (while still being reasonably popular). AFAICT, neither is true but please submit a more detailed proposal if I am wrong. Thank you, Alex. _______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
