Hey,
I have a question, in your scenario, if you would be able to statically
cache all these updates using nginx, or another cache_peer, would it
sound OK? or good enough?
Eliezer
On 14/03/2016 16:32, Heiler Bemerguy wrote:
Hi Eliezer and Joe!!!
Thank you very much for your support.
I have done a test here too. I've replaced 3.5.15 with 3.5.14 and the
high bandwidth (associated with SWAPFAIL) is GONE.
I've checked twice the sources diffs between 14 and 15 and can't tell
what break this.. but I'm running 3.5.14 for 3 days without any
download-loop sucking all our bandwidth.
I'm still having a SWAPFAIL here and there, and a lot of MISSES for
files that should have been cached... but no high bandwidth !!
_______________________________________________
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
