On 22/02/2016 12:39 a.m., Antony Stone wrote: > On Sunday 21 February 2016 at 11:34:44, HackXBack wrote: > >> Bump links by extension files >> and not by servername > > I'm still not at all sure I understand what you mean. > > Please give one example of what you want to do and explain why it would be an > improvement over the standard method. And think about the amount of information that is contained in a "example.com:443" data string. That is almost the complete total of what is available to make the bump decision. *IF* even that is available. Amos _______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
