On 11/01/2016 11:18 p.m., Alex Samad wrote: > Hi > > On 11 January 2016 at 18:54, Amos Jeffries <squid3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> guessing I have to bump up the 200M max to 800mb. >> >> Maybe. But IMHO use the ACLs tat range_offset_limit can take. > > your suggesting to limit the offset limit to just the windows update sites Just the site(s), or may even just the URLs where service packs are put. The /svcpk/ part of the URL looks interesting in that way, though you would need to research. > >> >>> are the other values still okay ? >> >> Yes. > > so if I bump it up to 800Mb it will start to work okay again ? "work okay" is a matter of perspective and bandwidth. It will enable the larger items to cache and HIT. But you will still spend more bandwidth than than you miht like. > > so using http://wiki.squid-cache.org/SquidFaq/WindowsUpdate which i > used to get the rules > the special way to make this work is > > turn off all the client pc. then do a single download of the file - > this will place all of it in the cache > > then I can turn the other clients back on .. > Yes. But, "turn off" could be ACLs in Squid that reject the download from everyone but you rather than going around every client machine manually twice. Amos _______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users