2015-12-16 12:58 GMT+01:00 Amos Jeffries <squid3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
On 16/12/2015 11:12 p.m., Antonio Petrelli wrote:
> Hello
> sorry if this question has been asked, and answered, already, I dug the
> mailing list archive but it is still not clear to me.
>
> Is it possible to use a cache_peer that supports NTLM authentication in a
> "transparent" way, so that the user of the Squid proxy does not need to
> enter any authentication and Squid does all the authentication by itself?
No that is not supported. And we have no intention of adding it, NTLM
has been deprected for nearly 10 years.
Squid supports performing Negotiate/Kerberos authentication to
cache_peer instead.
> Notice that, until now, I am using CNTLM to do this, however CNTLM has
> severe problems under Windows 8.
Notice that NTLM has increasingly severe problems under any Windows XP
SP3 or later system.
Thank you. Notice that I asked this question because I would like to use Squid as a personal local proxy for different type of upstream proxy, so that a user can use their Squid instance on their machine and the only thing to do is switch the correct configuration file when switching workplace. Currently I do it by using Squid or CNTLM when needed and I also wrote a proxy in Java for it, however it is really memory-consuming, especially compared to Squid:
Thank you anyway for your answer and sorry for the rant
Antonio
_______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
