-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 18.11.15 1:27, Amos Jeffries пишет: > On 17/11/2015 10:16 p.m., Alexander Rottinghaus wrote: >> Dear squid users, >> we have a website that uses a persistent wss-connection to provide large amounts >> of data to our cutomers. The company of one of our cutomers uses squid in their >> network. Is there any way that our customers can use our website over their >> squid proxy? > > If the software at the client end is able to perform HTTP CONNECT > messages properly to initiate the WSS over an HTTP tunnel, then they > should have no problem using your service in that way. > > Squid does not support native WebSockets traffic though, so does not > perform the Upgrade on other request methods. The current stable > releases also do not do port 443 interception of WSS, though the Squid-4 > beta has a non-HTTPS bypass feature that might let it work. .... but also may not let it work. In details, it still does not work on some IM's, which also uses it's own tunnels over HTTP. > > > Amos > > _______________________________________________ > squid-users mailing list > squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWS4TFAAoJENNXIZxhPexGGwYH/RhpDNzlteWv+mwZugcsyfyD imfSEGamPe4UXKH3uZT6VtbZtDccl/y4GwKrD4u0RgyXtCif+j2trVuxIJY+tk97 eXE8uzghQOiyjIzTpEO9lGHHnLjN9EHvWi251FXchssCbPipbxqqmdUZgaHjZfbu mxZx6OsUtA5WRXG1z9DOtbmaHX2zo1T5bVhIsNceYFR1Yo+tYXXwgsXE3hbyg5Of RSTGAL5fGxx5xUL8FyZW9izbO1WEcCteaCCiDcI5M47bbLxu8mmSUX9CvVQjW6V3 uIc6pnfUoJR/IlTxdWIg92RPQ33vpY8rx/HygTidqyGrJdwEzwNVN6PA4qimq4g= =tHR6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
