Hi. On 16.11.2015 00:14, Yuri Voinov wrote: > It's common knowledge. Squid is unable to pass an unknown protocol on > the standard port. Consequently, the ability to proxy this protocol does > not exist. > > If it was simply a tunneling ... It is not https. And not just > HTTP-over-443. This is more complicated and very marginal protocol. > I'm really sorry to tell you that, but you are perfectly wrong. These non-HTTPS tunnels have been working for years. And this isn't JTTPS because of: # openssl s_client -connect login.icq.com:443 CONNECTED(00000003) 34379270680:error:140770FC:SSL routines:SSL23_GET_SERVER_HELLO:unknown protocol:/usr/src/secure/lib/libssl/../../../crypto/openssl/ssl/s23_clnt.c:782: --- no peer certificate available --- No client certificate CA names sent --- SSL handshake has read 7 bytes and written 297 bytes --- New, (NONE), Cipher is (NONE) Secure Renegotiation IS NOT supported Compression: NONE Expansion: NONE --- Eugene. _______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
