Search squid archive

Re: Is ntlm_fake_auth known to work?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le 05/11/2015 04:18, Amos Jeffries a écrit :

Depends on what Squid version you are using. It was broken for a few
years. We fixed that issue a few months back and it was apparently
working now. that Good news is you can grab the latest Squid code (v4 or
3.5), build it and use the helper generated on older Squid installations
if you need to use old Squid for some reason.

It also depends on what software you are trying to authenticate. NTLM
was deprecated in 2006 by MS and they started disabling it by default in
software since 2006, and fully removed it from some products around 2010
sometime.

It also depends what security level you have your NTLM set to. Use with
NLMv2-only clients may vary. It will definitely not work with NTLMv2
with security extensions.

Amos

_______________________________________________
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users

Well maybe I'm doing something wrong. My current production version 3.4.8 with ntlm_auth (debian) using squid-2.5-ntlmssp worked nicely. But as I don't really need authentication, just the username I wanted to get rid of the samba stuff. I've compiled 3.5.10 (debian) and tried ntlm_fake_auth and I keep getting the user/password screen on the browser.

I know NTLM really depends on client, but I hoped what have worked with ntlm_auth would have worked with ntlm_fake_auth.

Any clue?

EG
_______________________________________________
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Samba]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux USB]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux