On 10/28/2015 10:46 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
NP: these problems do not exist for forward proxies. Only for traffic
hijacking interceptor proxies.
On 29.10.15 09:05, Alex Rousskov wrote:
For intercepted connections, Squid should, with an admin permission,
connect to the intended IP address without validating whether that IP
address matches the domain name (and without any side effects of such
validation). In interception mode, the proxy should be as "invisible"
(or as "invasive") as the admin wants it to be IMO -- all validations
and protections should be optional. We could still enable them by
default, of course.
SslBumped CONNECT-to-IP tunnels are essentially intercepted connections
as well, even if they are using forwarding (not intercepting) http_ports.
the "admin permission" is the key qestion here. There's possible problem
where the malicious client can connect to malicious server, ask for any
server name and the malicious content could get cached by squid as a proper
response.
I guess most of admins do intercepting to avoid client configuration, not to
hide the proxies.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@xxxxxxxxxxx ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
I don't have lysdexia. The Dog wouldn't allow that.
_______________________________________________
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
