On 10/26/2015 04:41 AM, Yuri Voinov wrote: > what has changed so much that the same > configuration I get 10 times smaller cache hit. You are asking a good question. I do not think anybody knows the exact answer -- too many things have changed in general to either identify the changes that have affected your [complicated] setup or to exclude all of the changes and blame some yet-unknown v4 bug. However, the following procedure is almost guaranteed to lead you to the answer: 1. Find a URL/resource that was served from the cache in v3 but became a miss in v4. You probably have access.logs that can be used for that. If not, enable them and run more experiments. Since your drop in hit ratio is so drastic, it should not take long to find a URL that was usually a hit before and is usually a miss now (or that becomes a hit/miss as soon as you switch to v3/4). 2. Reproduce the v4 miss with an ALL,9 cache.log and share that log. Do this using single-transaction command-line tools, with no other traffic going through Squid. Others on this list can guide you as to what logging options to use if you do not want to run with ALL,9. The above requires some work on your part. It is a good idea to run these tests in a non-production environment (which may require even more work from you). Needless to say, you are not required to do that extra work. However, some extra work is most likely required if you want to get the answer to your question because there is currently not enough information to answer it. HTH, Alex. _______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
