On 14/10/2015 11:46 a.m., Chico Venancio wrote: > I have configured delay pools for a client that delays access to a few > sites, including youtube and facebook. > It seems to work for some clients, and has significantly reduced link > congestion. However, some clients seem to be unaffected by the delay pools. > > The output to squidclient mgr:delay is as follows: > > Sending HTTP request ... done. > HTTP/1.1 200 OK > Server: squid/3.4.8 > Mime-Version: 1.0 > Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 22:43:28 GMT > Content-Type: text/plain > Expires: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 22:43:28 GMT > Last-Modified: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 22:43:28 GMT > X-Cache: MISS from proxy-server > X-Cache-Lookup: MISS from proxy-server:3128 > Via: 1.1 proxy-server (squid/3.4.8) > Connection: close > > Delay pools configured: 1 > > Pool: 1 > Class: 2 > > Aggregate: > Max: 20000 > Restore: 10000 > Current: -108514139 > > Individual: > Max: 12000 > Restore: 7000 > Current: 87:12000 56:12000 92:12000 123:12000 94:-58135034 > 89:12000 223:12000 55:12000 93:12000 > > Memory Used: 1496 bytes > > > I have searched for answers and some do mention that sometimes the current > bytes in the pool shoudl be negative, but a low negative like -1 or -6. To > me it seems that the delay pools are beeing ignored... Sounds like it might be a side effect of <http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=522> Or it could be the fact that delay pools are still 32-bit functionality. Amos _______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
