Hi Antony, I had actually seen that document and it's "10%". That's why I've left 20% also taking in mind the space reserved for 'root'. I suppose we have to increase it and go on trial/error until we find a safe margin? NMM On Tue, 2015-10-13 at 17:42 +0200, Antony Stone wrote: > On Tuesday 13 October 2015 at 16:37:10, Nelson Manuel Marques wrote: > > > On Tue, 2015-10-13 at 20:22 +0600, Yuri Voinov wrote: > > > > > > Squid has its own in-memory cache, what's the point to put the > > > disk > > > cache to the same ?! > > > > The problem here isn't the tmpfs, but instead Squid going 20% over > > the > > max size defined in cache_dir, or am I missing something? > > Have you read: > http://wiki.squid-cache.org/SquidFaq/ConfiguringSquid > "What cache_dir size should I use?" > > 20% extra may be more than you were expecting, but it's not > ridiculous. > > > Antony. > -- Nelson Manuel Marques <nmm@xxxxxxxxxxx> Administrador de Sistemas Eurotux Informática S.A. | www.eurotux.com (t) +351 253 680 300
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
