On 28.09.15 15:59, Leonardo Rodrigues wrote:
I have a running squid that, until some weeks ago, was not
doing any kind of cache, it was just used for access controle
rules. Now i have enabled it for windows updateand some
specificURLs caching and it's just working fine.
Em 29/09/15 07:42, Matus UHLAR - fantomas escreveu:
windows updates are so badly designed that the only sane way to get them
cached it running windows update server (WSUS).
On 29.09.15 09:50, Leonardo Rodrigues wrote:
WSUS works for corporate environments, not for all the others.
And caching Windows Update with squid is pretty trivial actually, it
doesnt even need URL rewriting as other services, youtube for
example, do. And it works just fine !!
hmm, when did this change?
IIRC that was big problem since updates use huge files and fetch only parts
of them, which squid wasn't able to cache.
But i'm off for a few years, maybe M$ finally fixed that up...
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@xxxxxxxxxxx ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Linux is like a teepee: no Windows, no Gates and an apache inside...
_______________________________________________
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
