OK then,
Your logic kind of adds-up to me.
So basically if a system doesn't touch OPTIONS\PUT\OTHER methods it can
cause issues and the arguments of the sysadmin I encountered is kind of
non realistic for most cases but can apply to a very specific environment.
And the result would be that I would need to take in account that each
and every request from squid may pass the ICAP service and needs to be
handled.
Thanks,
Eliezer
* I am just finishing the basic tests of the ICAP service(for REQMOD
only) I have written and that will be published later.
On 29/09/2015 00:31, Alex Rousskov wrote:
I see no logical connection from "the main subject [is] content in the
body" and "[checking] OPTIONS [bodies] might not be required". Since
OPTIONS responses may have a body, and you said that you want to block
abusive content in the body, it seems logical to filter OPTIONS.
Alex.
_______________________________________________
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users