On 3/09/2015 3:04 a.m., Yuri Voinov wrote: > > Here is another case with the same image: > > http://i.imgur.com/qM52aPQ.png > > The same, right? > > So, I proposed to leave thousands of copies of the same image, even > within a single user session, just because someone is afraid once again > to cache? And I know that the site in question, works perfectly and 100% > functional? > > Don't think so. No arguments about that particular site. You found, what you found. But that is also what I keep saying to people, investigate each case and be sure about it first. The pattern you created from this one site was applied *everywhere* all at once. Nobody knows what its broken already, or about to. So best way is to create a pattern for the site and any others you find using the same software. Maybe you could sniff the Server headers or something to identify a common CMS system doing this and apply the pattern to its outputs. Lots of captures but still less than _everywhere_. Amos _______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
