-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Here is an example. Look at this three screenshots. First. Two images requested by one client at the same time. http://i.imgur.com/JbMhTQ4.png This is the same image: http://i.imgur.com/4khcCOT.png http://i.imgur.com/Ya58kfG.png Agree? And - image is too small to contains any functional payload. Agree? So, argument is simple random value to suppress caching. Right? So, will cache or remains uncached? Will cache with store-ID: http://i.imgur.com/ZZmOMKz.png What I'm doing wrong? 02.09.15 16:23, Eliezer Croitoru пишет: > On 02/09/2015 13:00, Yuri Voinov wrote: >> >> I'm getting a very high hit ratio in my cache.And I do not intend to >> lower its with myself. Enough and that on the opposite side of the >> thousands of webmasters counteract caching their content on its own >> grounds. Beginning from YouTube. > > Well, Most sane server side caches do allow and work with a 304 validation and in many cases it's good. > Notice that I have not seen an access.log analyzer that counts re-validation successfully until now. > I do not know what the situation of your bandwidth usage or needs but there is a term which called "over caching" and it depends on the environment. > If you see that the cache is working for you with higher numbers then 30% consider that your cache maybe is caching more then the standard cache. > I am pretty sure that a domain analysis can find the more accurate refresh_patterns that can leave you with high cache hit ratio and still make the cache less vulnerable to config mistakes. > > Maybe clients didn't complained until now but it doesn't states that they do not have any issues. It's just that they didn't got to you yet. > If you are using 3.4.X and up you are in a better place then in 3.2.X and older version so squid should be safe enough for a very ambitious config file. > > All The Bests, > Eliezer > > * Thanks for sharing the refresh_patterns discussion with others > _______________________________________________ > squid-users mailing list > squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJV5w6iAAoJENNXIZxhPexGDzYIAJAErNXvzVBYR9PyipjXiwqR 8kSL5g2HvKAuF601p8axmUND00a4UXNDI+Xx0lXv6viYCaltYcnDu8rn5N5M1xwV bjV0cZGNlqvh04494/ZyR1wisUHRJP1+nRSNUnMhr2aFZ8lU4khqZZQGl66/yELn o4ZmMe20dS9NzdzoGOBKkflNXfzlf63/psVKjGFU50A7kTJq301xrEH2wWih0Nxk BjRkHLLKG5v9IZwBA6ymQb6+ecFP+gGORJ/dprNsp42CNSNZxrw1MEG2I4Mt0TlM 1XH92L5J5mzS6kz9GuLMmN9BbTRZz5hSDJAQ6bck4fkFvtli+pjuLGDrZUJiUNA= =B1sj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
