On 27/08/2015 6:48 a.m., FredT wrote: > Hi Amos, > > OK, clear :o) > > Did you think to apply the low/high to the "Filemap Used" too ? > From my point of view the Filemap Used is much more important in the objects > cleaning because it reaches the 16 million entries faster than the cache > space, especialy with small objects (<64kb). > In those circumstances this algorithm clears out fileno faster than it clears space. Since theagrressiveness is measured in pure count of how many fileno/sec it tries to free up. At high-water it will always try to free 220 fileno/sec but that may be 0.0001% of the cache distance towards low-water - forcing another 220 etc the next second. Only when caching bigger objects will the fileno free-ups be low - when it doesn't matter as much. I've put a "TODO possible improvements" list into the code where someone will see it anyway. With that and the other things to experiment with. Amos _______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
