I'll compile it and report as soon as I get a crash, luckily the changes will have resolved the issue! Thanks for all the hard work! -----Original Message----- From: squid-users [mailto:squid-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Amos Jeffries Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2015 11:05 PM To: squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: ETA for Bug 3775 On 21/08/2015 1:14 p.m., Nicolaas Hyatt wrote: > Hey guys, > > I have been paying close attention to the list for a while and am just > beginning to realize the scale of things the squid team has in front > of them. So please understand that I'm _NOT_ begging here. I > understand other priority issues take precedence, and my little issue > is way on down the line. I was wondering if there was some sort of > schedule as to when this may be examined in case I need to provide any > more dumps. > > > > http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3775 > Unknown again I'm afraid. That latest feedback was a painfully disappointing result from a very hopeful looking approach. If you have a dump that provides any new backtrace sequence to what we have already they may be useful. So far it all still seems to link back to a DeferredReader pausing a transaction read, then something else playing around with its I/O socket/FD/connection, then defer resumes and boom. But there is potentially some minutes of delay between those actions. PS. you may want to help with the testing of todays snapshot when its ready, it contains some patches to HTTPS and FTP connection handling that may have an impact on this bug (or not, grasping at straws here). Amos _______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users _______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
