-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 I think, that using datacenter (not consumer) class HDD is more preferrable than SSD. Cache content lost means cached traffic and money loss. And this is not acceptable for big caches. 15.07.15 19:57, FredB пишет: > >> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA256 >> >> It depends from your squid settings (memory cache size, etc), your OS >> (as expected), your fs. >> >> My installation works 4 years 24x7 with shipped HDD. >> > > Yes, in my case it depends of number of read/write by second, I know that I often reached some life time expectancy for a hard disk drive, but I mean, I heard (but maybe I'm wrong) that SSD still easily breakable and with short life time, at least more short, this is not dangerous for a cache ? > _______________________________________________ > squid-users mailing list > squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVpmdqAAoJENNXIZxhPexGHE0IAKPo73Tpd7LlIbcFXe0FceK4 6u/waFkb2Vtg2CbkEbI54l4w392kDNVEYcoy9CA0/i+6w8YnG/4lMDWNiueDzWUy XS+lJW5LWcS/yLWAfRFJYNZPICzR8KqFDfQ6EG3QcAvVcnhRAkmv0Trq7gNx5n9T HH9CTGzMLqXKaUhbALKeJl7JaP6VJPxaC8Zi1KXoE43XB3/XvmZx2OL+Y4t6nQq8 vuNZ0jRM+007hY1H7FDHbegbbFYQtI+DB7LfeKACVAmdFC4fAoq0EmH/ZQBpO15G Dbf/c1ipeTI/gn04LY1m7XTrcOUZEA3vxwe+dBccvi+fU7SuBEN0bwALHZqPP6U= =jgIC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
