Search squid archive

Re: AUFS vs. DISKS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





> 
> Hi Fred,
> 
> We did the tests with 1 hard disk only (for testing), we used 150
> req/sec,
> load was around 0.7-0.8
> Naaa, response times are crazy in DISKD/TCP_HIT (20+ sec instead 0.5
> sec in
> AUFS) but it concerns TCP_HIT only, the other flags are corrects in
> DISKD.
> 
> I'll try the "noatime"...
> 
> Fred
> 

Hi Fred too :)

So there is a problem somewhere I can reach 800 r/s with diskd, but in my case with aufs I can't exceed 400 r/s without many warning messages and "No such file"

client_http.requests= 481.95951/sec
Hit response time = more or less 1.5 s (for a file size 9.7 M) 6.27M/s

I don't re-try Rock store now because it was unusable after some minutes, this is not a "light" test for me 

_______________________________________________
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Samba]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux USB]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux