On 15/07/2015 9:59 p.m., Stakres wrote: > Yury, > > you mean that having the DISKD 52 times slower then AUFS with linux OS is > normal ? > I cannot believe that, incredible ! > > I could understand the double or the triple, but here we're speaking about > 50+ times... Yes. Exactly so. The difference is threading: diskd has 1 I/O thread. AUFS has 64 I/O threads. On a 1:1 thread comparison AUFS logics is very slightly slower, but in aggregate its orders of magnitude faster. Amos _______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
