Search squid archive

Re: Conditional question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2015-05-30 at 16:24 -0600, James Lay wrote:
On Sun, 2015-05-31 at 08:45 +1200, Amos Jeffries wrote:
On 31/05/2015 4:48 a.m., James Lay wrote:
> Per the docs:
> 
> #  Conditional configuration
> #
> #       If-statements can be used to make configuration directives
> #       depend on conditions:
> #
> #           if <CONDITION>
> #               ... regular configuration directives ...
> #           [else
> #               ... regular configuration directives ...]
> #           endif
> #
> #       The else part is optional. The keywords "if", "else", and
> "endif"
> #       must be typed on their own lines, as if they were regular
> #       configuration directives.
> #
> #       NOTE: An else-if condition is not supported.
> #
> #       These individual conditions types are supported:
> #
> #           true
> #               Always evaluates to true.
> #           false
> #               Always evaluates to false.
> #           <integer> = <integer>
> #               Equality comparison of two integer numbers.
> 
> Anyone have any examples, documentation, heck ANYTHING that can show how
> this works?  I can't seem to find a thing besides the above.

Those are for process controls (SMP, named services, etc).

>  My goal is
> something like the below:
> 
> if port = 80
>     http_access deny all
> else
>     http_access allow all
> endif
> 
> But nothing I'm trying as the condition _expression_ is working.  Thank
> you.

The default Squid configuration should "just work"...

  http_access deny !Safe_ports
  http_access deny CONNECT !SSL_Ports
  ...
  # this one permits the CONNECT *:443 requests to get bumped
  http_access allow localnet
  ..
  http_access deny all

If you are using any other access controls on your client traffic you
need to keep in mind that Squid is dealing with "CONNECT raw-IP:443 ..."
requests in http_access / adapted_http_access / url_rewrite_access /
adaptation_access / ssl_bump prior to bumping them.

Amos
_______________________________________________
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users

Hi again Amos,

So...my method of access control might be weird.  I have a regex list of sites that work fine via http (say \.acer\.com).  So, I allow access to this list via:

acl allowed_http_sites url_regex "/opt/etc/squid/http_url.txt
http_access allow allowed_http_sites
http_access deny !allowed_http_sites

This works well for allowing access to the list of sites....the lack of http_access allow localnet makes this happen.  With the above however, ssl_bumping stops working as I get:

[16:18:22 jlay@powerbook:~/test$ wget --ca-certificate=/etc/ssl/certs/sslsplit_ca_cert.pem -d https://www.msn.com
DEBUG output created by Wget 1.16 on linux-gnu.

URI encoding = ‘UTF-8’
--2015-05-30 16:19:46--  https://www.msn.com/
Certificates loaded: 173
Resolving www.msn.com (www.msn.com)... 204.79.197.203
Caching www.msn.com => 204.79.197.203
Connecting to www.msn.com (www.msn.com)|204.79.197.203|:443... connected.
Created socket 4.
Releasing 0x10c3ef98 (new refcount 1).
The certificate's owner does not match hostname ‘www.msn.com

May 30 16:19:46 analysis squid: 192.168.1.73 - - [30/May/2015:16:19:46 -0600] "CONNECT 204.79.197.203:443 HTTP/1.1" - 200 0 TCP_DENIED:HIER_NONE peek

Adding http_access alllow localnet makes ssl_bumping work correctly, but then the http_access deny !allowed_http_sites does not work.  I'm having a hard time getting both http and https filtering to play well together with one instance of squid.  I'd like to try and just go with one, but if I have to I'll go with two.  Anyway thanks again for looking...I hope I'm explaining this well.

James

_______________________________________________
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users

Ok I think I got it...added:

acl allow_https port 443
...
http_access allow allow_https

Now my clients are allowed full port 443 access, which gets a decision of allow or block later on, and this also allows my "usual" http access list....woo hoo!  I'll post the full info later.  Thanks so much.

James
_______________________________________________
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Samba]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux USB]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux