On 19/05/2015 9:04 p.m., Amos Jeffries wrote:
> On 19/05/2015 8:36 p.m., Stefan Kuegler wrote:
>>
>> Will the RESPMOD POSTCACHE vectoring point be available in future
>> versions of squid?
>>
>
> Unkown at this point. Its a lot of work and extra complexity we are
> generally trying to avoid adding.
>
> However, Alex Rousskov from Measurement Factory put a project proposal
> to squid-dev mid last year and I've not hear anything since. If its
> seriously important for you I suggest getting in touch with him about
> sponsoring it.
>
PS. You could achieve the same thing using two proxies. One to cache and
one to AV scan.
Something much like this:
workers 2
# frontend worker (proxy)
if ${process_number} = 1
http_port 3128
cache_peer localhost parent 8080 0 no-query
endif
# backend worker (cache)
if ${process_number} = 2
http_port localhost:8080
visible_hostname backend.local
forwarded_for transparent
# traffic is expected only to come from the other worker
http_access deny !localhost
cache_dir ...
# config specific to the caching
endif
...
# shared config, including the RESPMOD pre-cache AV scanning callouts.
Amos
_______________________________________________
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
