On 19/05/2015 8:58 a.m., Stakres wrote: > Hi All, > > Has someone of you already cached this object ? > *http://r8---sn-n4g-jqbe.gvt1.com/edgedl/chrome/win/776B03BEAFB2810D/42.0.2311.152_chrome_installer.exe* > I get a 15min cacheable 302 response from that. > I know this is a dynamic object provided by Google, we tried with the > StoreID by not yet able to get a TCP_HIT from Squid. > If any idea, let me/us know, thanks in advance. Are you perhapse looking at your logs with out query strings? That cacheable 302 I mentioned redirects to itself with lots of extra CMS query string parameters. Following that redirect dumps out a program binary with "Vary: *" which changes per request. If you look at the chrome installer itself the application binary contains per-user embeded code and "stuff". So no its not cacheable. The only cacheable part of this is the 302 response. Amos _______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
