Hello Amos and Eliezer,
Regarding this: > My guess is that its been patched to cope with the action code and > kv-pair syntax. But not concurrency enabled. Which is mandatory on the > Store-ID interface. You are right about the kv-pair syntax patch, that's exactly it. But about concurrency, we're running Squid as a unique process. Do we need to modify jesred in order to handle Store-ID interface? The only modification we did to jesred is that we changed the output string that it gives back to Squid. About this: > You really sure 20 children is enough for 1200 clients? Also whenever > bypass on? Is there any formula to calculate how many children should we use based on the amount of requests per second? Or is it just try and error? We' re getting the impresion that jesred processes are waiting for some kind of signal to die once they're no longer necessary, ergo they just stay there, doing nothing. Regards, Ulises El 01/05/15 04:55, Croitoru escribió: So I assume it's a rewrite for the urls. |
_______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users