On 20/03/2015 7:17 p.m., Amos Jeffries wrote: > On 20/03/2015 2:55 p.m., Lawrence Pingree wrote: >> No matter what cache_mem I set it seems that MRTG queries via SNMP never >> seem to get beyond 1 GB even running the latest 3.5 code. Amos, is the code >> capable of allocating more than one gig of memory? > > Yes but the SNMPv2 used by Squid only has 32-bit counters. > > We have quite a few 32-bit wrap related bugs waiting somebody who knows > SNMP to do a library upgrade to SNMPv3. Forgot to mention the other possibility... cache_mem is an HTTP data cache and has the same object limits as any disk cache. None of them may store more than 2^27-1 objects due to design limits in the indexing. cache_mem also has a much higher rate of 0-byte and small objects than disks usually see. So its very possible that simply the size of 2^27-1 worth of the small and most popular objects in your traffic == 1GB. Amos _______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
