Hey Eliezer
I don't actually use SMP. I could be wrong about the aufs thing; I haven't personally tested—and don't currently plan to test—any other cache types. I just gleaned that from the comments in the bug reports.
Kind regards
Dan
On 20 March 2015 at 13:45, Eliezer Croitoru <eliezer@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hey Dan and John,
If indeed this bug is only for UFS\AUFS cache_dir then I would try to make sure that large-rock will not sustain the same issue.
I have not seen in any of the bug reports anything that would reproduce the issue.
To make sure the issue is understood and can or cannot be reproduced using ufs\aufs will give one direction.
I would try to test large rock in my next testing round with SMP but if anyone has some option to test it first I will be glad if it will be done to make sure ufs\aufs is the culprit.
Also if indeed it's with aufs\ufs only with SMP then it means that the issue is related to the way SMP can make a ufs\aufs cache_dir dirty and there for the answer would be pretty simple to the issue in hands.
Eliezer
On 20/03/2015 00:32, Dan Charlesworth wrote:
Hi John
This bug has been affecting me on an off for a while as well. I believe it
only affects aufs and, unfortunately, has been around for years.
See:http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3279
And see:http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3483
_______________________________________________
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
_______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
