Oh … Duly noted. > On 26 Feb 2015, at 4:20 pm, Amos Jeffries <squid3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 26/02/2015 6:08 p.m., dan@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >> Thanks Amos! >> >> >> I reckon that dns_packet_max directive might be playing into it. Most of the problematic hostnames seem to return large pools of IPs. >> > > Well, its not doing anything by default. But can be turned on to gain. > > Just be aware that your firewall and routing software all along the DNS > pathways needs to support EDNS0 and large UDP packets. Its off by > default because some popular devices (cheap Cisco kit / Linksys / > DynaLink in my experience, but not necessarily only them) often crash > when these type of DNS packets are delivered over them. > > Amos > _______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
