Search squid archive

Re: Tracking down cache MISSes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




25.02.15 16:46, Greg пишет:
On 25 February 2015 at 03:30, Amos Jeffries <squid3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 2015-02-25 05:31, Greg wrote:
so, there's my proxy problem I couldn't crack, even after spending
2+ days tweaking-googling-debugging. :(

The problem: my _new_ Squid installation (Ubuntu 14 LTS with Squid
3.3.8) won't cache most pages the old Squid does (old Fedora with
Squid 3.1.15).

Both versions are antique.

Man, you change one rancid meat to another rancid meat.

Just FYI - current Squid version at least 3.4.12. Oh, this branch is
already deprecated... shit, current version is 3.5.2!

This must be your starting point.

Thanks for your comment. Please note that this version is what's
supported by Ubuntu LTS for the next 5 years. This happens with all
packages - LTS maintainers choose a stable version and merge security
updates into it, so it stays secure and needs no config updates for 5
years. This is just we need, and it has worked well for Ubuntu 10
(squid 2.7.STABLE7-1ubuntu12.6 is still being supported until this
April!), but it has EOL now and we have to upgrade.


And these types of problem are the cost. Ubuntu and other distros providing
long LTS support choose not to backport bug fixes *unless* its a security
fix. That is their choice, and your choice to accept by using their distro
version.
Exactly. I reckon it's not easy for everyone involved.

For the record this appears to be bug 3806 which was fixed in 3.3.12 just
over a year ago. 3.3.8 is just too old by ~4 months.
Wow, thanks! This is a breakthrough for me. Indeed, the requests that
do get cached don't have a Vary header.

This one's for you: http://goo.gl/qK5dE3

Now that I understand the problem I can think about a possible solution:
- Try to convince the Ubuntu 14 LTS maintainers to merge the fixes (
http://bugs.squid-cache.org/attachment.cgi?id=2854&action=diff and
http://bugs.squid-cache.org/attachment.cgi?id=2969&action=diff ). Not
sure about my chances ;)
Try it. They just men the same as we.

- Create a new baseline server for our proxies with Ubuntu 12 LTS
(Squid 3.1.19-1ubuntu3.12.04.3) and upgrade to Ubuntu 16 LTS in 2017.
Pro: I tested it and that old Squid version doesn't seem to have this
bug. Will work and will be getting security fixes until 2017. Con:
well it's a rather old Squid and a less comfortable Ubuntu.
- Step out of the safe zone of LTS and install the latest stable
Squid. Pro: all the fixes and fresh code. Con: will have to manually
monitor the Squid security fixes, and on each security update upgrade
to the newest stable, manually testing if anything breaks,
merging/changing configs when necessary, then manually upgrade all
(10+) proxies - from now till forever.

Since I'm a ~beginner sysadmin, any thoughts and comments are warmly welcome.

Best regards,
Greg
_______________________________________________
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users

_______________________________________________
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Samba]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux USB]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux