On 23/02/2015 1:19 a.m., Karl-Philipp Richter wrote: > Hi, > According to > http://lists.squid-cache.org/pipermail/squid-users/2015-February/002323.html > the `ignore-no-cache` option is outdated. Shouldn't `squid -k check` > warn about its presence (I verified that the check works by adding `bla` > at the end of the config file with causes a warning `unrecognized: > 'bla'`)? Currently the validation passes in 3.4.11 (on FreeBSD 9.3). Squid is capable of running with it present in the config. It just has no meaning any more. So there is no reason to halt an otherwise usable proxy. If you run "squid -k parse" to verify the config it displays an UPGRADE notice about it. squid -k parse is better to use for verifying configurations. It will continue past some types of FATAL and give you a better list of the errors that exist, rather than just the first detected. Amos _______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
