On 12/02/2015 4:14 a.m., Silamael wrote: > On 02/11/2015 02:11 PM, Yuri Voinov wrote: >> >> 11.02.15 19:07, Silamael пишет: >>> On 02/11/2015 12:51 PM, Silamael wrote: >>>> On 02/11/2015 11:10 AM, Yuri Voinov wrote: >>>>> Squid first saves object in memory. Then swapout object to cache. As >>>>> usual: >>>>> This is no memory leaking, but normal cache behaviour. As documented. >>>>> >>>>> You can play around with range_offset_limit and quick_abort_min >>>>> parameters. >>>>> >>>>> Or try to no cache this FTP with ACL. >>>>> >>>>> Usually, when suggests memory leaking, this often OS issue. Not Squid. >>>> Hello Yuri, >>>> >>>> Thanks for your quick reply. >>>> The ACL you suggested will probably solve the problem. >>> Just got the info that the customer already has disabled the caching. >>> Sounds no longer as "normal behaviour" to me. >> As Amos said, may be - may be not. > > Amos said something? Got no mail from him. > Must have been earlier threads, this is my first reply in this thread. >> Some FTP files pointless to cache. > > Sure, maybe some FTP files are not to be cached. > >> >> If it need just once..... For what cache it? > > I do not want to cache any. And I think a 'cache deny all' does that. Correct. > Nevertheless, even with no caching at all the Squid process constantly > needs more memory and squidclient reports that the memory is used for > the 2K buffers. > > Just try it. Squid with default configuration and cache deny all and > then do some wget ftp://server/path/. Each requests will increase the 2K > buffers. > Thank you. Can you drop that into a bug report please so we dont loose track of it? Cheers Amos _______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
