|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Yep. Can we sum near hits with hits to determine real cache hit ratio? Or this is not correct? 29.01.2015 19:57, Amos Jeffries пишет: > On 29/01/2015 11:24 p.m., Yuri Voinov wrote: > > > Amos, > > > btw. > > > Which type of hits cachemgr collects and shows? TCP_HIT only? > > > What about other HIT-types? > > All of them, broken down into cache-HITs and near-HITs categories. > > As you can see in the info report, like this: > > " > Median Service Times (seconds) 5 min 60 min: > HTTP Requests (All): 0.05331 0.04519 > Cache Misses: 0.03622 0.04519 > Cache Hits: 0.00000 0.01387 > Near Hits: 0.09219 0.23230 > " > > Amos > _______________________________________________ > squid-users mailing list > squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUykuqAAoJENNXIZxhPexGPFcIAJ55XDBJKp6zitqyg4YBwZ4a 2Et8V9WjEarpbhA/a3AlbVOWPpufQDwUNDXAgfYuWQQM5G24Fyr+baybZV8jbzEb pJ9zvH8xJ0+a4kBNYjjya8bLXU9PzxuSVyLiQUxtShyzE2aB5MxNsZ37vj1lcXYb P6MyA/bn6sFr+uV7ixdRs6LklGTow60toXv+5F17NgwTj3vSa/rKkoTfS3FXHf/G oAJQH90If5KOOapR7wo6sTr5EU6OceIwrDLmtRbqwBtRxdDXi3AQcE8lUcDGb16k 8qzPgmSGCBJYwpxnaL0gFYjgs/HWq+DMh3xvnOT1iZDe4osa9hkJgVlmJohFqzw= =KPd1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
_______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
