|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hmmmmmm...... Why so ancient Squid version? 3.1.x is legacy. Now Amos says: "Upgrade to last version". ;) Which is 3.5.1 (wow! :)) 28.01.2015 3:48, Bobby пишет: > > Sorry if you’re seeing this twice… I think I sent it to the wrong address the first time. > > > > > > Hello, > > Ive been using squid + dansguardian (NTLM) for a few years now > > and have begun setting up a new proxy with squid 3.1.20. Everything > > seems to be working fine except I don’t seem to be sending the > > usernames to dansguardian? Im just using the ntlm auth which is > > working fine for me with squid 2.7*, any ideas why this might be > > happening? > > I do see the traffic hitting dansguardian and it is > > filtering everything through "list" (basic non user filter) I just > > cant seem to get the usernames passed from squid to dansguardian for > > some reason. By the way the usernames do show up in squid3 log with > > one minor difference from the way they show up in my squid 2.7 log. > > In squid 2.7 the show up like this: > > Username > > In squid3 the show up like > > this: Domain\username > > Any ideas on what I may be doing wrong are greatly appreciated! > > Thanks! > > > > Bobby > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > squid-users mailing list > squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUyAiDAAoJENNXIZxhPexGW5UIAMky96ScHzlb7VM8Wxhj7PM/ YSChHHFvAT3kEsY1qKpK7dpS6D1DPeo+TmKBEUHj8tVQaD+o1mQYPTwaqrGyKcVd 8LHs1e21DOQGmXhyhg3+cnO3WynpraX2QsnL3flBYsK3h/zC8cEZNZ4FqjHuIXEA Riw3h2JpLIQWc7zKV8eB0JrkU4UNDDmdh47UKgMMjpkbi4wcM6aAGpNdf6ciUuAP tEBBoYU0C+KdNTRIk7sG7xeS0r3Hd14mBF0Q4PhnsOTF0ERKLv0JX5eB9OyiV6zn w2rwnBvyTtY494vmOFQlLF/fWWo0YX6rEPx7lckxPGyx5Lj8wfYWxArfD10kCwo= =6ob4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
_______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
