|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I have working production 3.4.10 with working ssl bumping. Config was the same as working 3.4.10. I've just want to take a look on new release. in squid.documented said, than backward compatibility server-first and none options for ssl_bump are kept. But: Neither works with old syntax, nor new. Looks like target https hosts not resolved and bump got only IP. 09.01.2015 16:41, Amos Jeffries пишет: > On 9/01/2015 9:36 p.m., Yuri Voinov wrote: > > > Hi, > > > gents. > > > I've try to test last daily-generated 3.5.0.4 and meet different > > behaviour (different from 3.4.10). > > > All squid-generated mimicked certs contains in CN only server IP, > > not hostname. > > > Following, all client browsers are unhappy. :) > > > What I'm doing wrong? > > What are you doing? specific squid.conf details please. > > Amos > _______________________________________________ > squid-users mailing list > squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUr7FWAAoJENNXIZxhPexGJuIH/2BO2NpSaIbKLKx86AAGiQt1 GWVk1jb+YeYsOyRR/Caw5nBApGe9ZteYD0tD9zqaHtz/eIIUdv9XORQxWvxtXtpH z4p7aFzEFRhZ4/3FMwKVtvZaJa5FZLqUVQXSL96kGOtKuXS40Un7gAUNggejuhrm ZrfUdD7kXycy9Y0GvRmhAIr+BjjuwzujkBqWk2R4ooPf5HSHmDSiG+dqhheIO/dO LShUco13el3ucLxrumPHSCUDUpSyPLPlvj4p9tyKJURoVv6v7bepCP7AYhA5YV1S EvJo8AAdLZTkVcbnTjiuqjB28F3dkB0LKvSJOSCNPIWcueX6X3Y8a5VR2+igANk= =510Q -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
_______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
