On 05.01.15 20:11, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
Did you had the chance to take look at bug 3997: http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3997
This could quite likely be the same issue. See my other post this morning for details, but I've pretty much tracked this down to the Negotiate tokens being appended to user cache records in an unbounded way. Eventually you end up with so many tokens (several thousand) that the majority of the CPU time is spent traversing the tokens. A quick look at the NTLM code suggests that this would behave in the same way.
The question now is what the "correct" way is to fix it - we could specifically avoid appending "token" notes in the Negotiate/NTLM code, or we could do something more generic in the absorb() method. (My preference is the latter unless anyone can think why it would be a bad idea).
-- - Steve Hill Technical Director Opendium Limited http://www.opendium.com Direct contacts: Instant messager: xmpp:steve@xxxxxxxxxxxx Email: steve@xxxxxxxxxxxx Phone: sip:steve@xxxxxxxxxxxx Sales / enquiries contacts: Email: sales@xxxxxxxxxxxx Phone: +44-1792-824568 / sip:sales@xxxxxxxxxxxx Support contacts: Email: support@xxxxxxxxxxxx Phone: +44-1792-825748 / sip:support@xxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
