On 19 November 2014 6:41:44 pm IST, brendan kearney <bpk678@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >it >if the Content-Type header is not set to >"application/x-ns-proxy-autoconfig". > Ah so that is why most of the java applets don't honour PAC settings and I was blaming poor coding of those applets. I usually serve PAC file with uhttpd or lighttpd servers running on the gateways and never bothered to set correct content-type headers. Would be great if you could include that in your document too. Regards, Nishant >GoToMeeting has also pissed me off. The client parses the script and >takes >any value found in it, before executing the script and taking the >output of >the execution. This has the result of finding inappropriate proxies to >use, >when you are in a corporate environment and have proxies dedicated to >client access or other functions that should not be leveraged in all >cases. I got their technical team on a call because we have a large >citrix >install base (both products have the same parent company) and >complained to >no avail. I had to write a doc on how to correct the client config for >anyone needing to use GoTo... products. >On Nov 19, 2014 6:18 AM, "Kinkie" <gkinkie@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> One word of caution: pactester uses the Firefox JavaScript engine, >which >> is more forgiving than MSIE's. So while it is a very useful tool, it >may >> let some errors slip through. >> On Nov 18, 2014 9:45 PM, "Jason Haar" <Jason_Haar@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> On 19/11/14 01:39, Brendan Kearney wrote: >>> > i would suggest that if you use a pac/wpad solution, you look into >>> > pactester, which is a google summer of code project that executes >pac >>> > files and provides output indicating what actions would be >returned to >>> > the browser, given a URL. >>> couldn't agree more. We have it built into our QA to run before we >ever >>> roll out any change to our WPAD php script (a bug in there means >>> everyone loses Internet access - so we have to be careful). >>> >>> Auto-generating a PAC script per client allows us to change >behaviour >>> based on User-Agent, client IP, proxy and destination - and allows >us to >>> control what web services should be DIRECT and what should be >proxied. >>> There is no other way of achieving those outcomes. >>> >>> Oh yes, and now that both Chrome and Firefox support proxies over >HTTPS, >>> I'm starting to ponder putting up some form of proxy on the Internet >for >>> our staff to use (authenticated of course!) - WPAD makes that >something >>> we could implement with no client changes - pretty cool :-) >>> >>> -- >>> Cheers >>> >>> Jason Haar >>> Corporate Information Security Manager, Trimble Navigation Ltd. >>> Phone: +1 408 481 8171 >>> PGP Fingerprint: 7A2E 0407 C9A6 CAF6 2B9F 8422 C063 5EBB FE1D 66D1 >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> squid-users mailing list >>> squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> squid-users mailing list >> squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users >> >> > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >_______________________________________________ >squid-users mailing list >squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. _______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
