Thanks - at least I can now start to plan for the future. Regards, Jacques -----Original Message----- From: Amos Jeffries [mailto:squid3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: 15 October 2014 01:48 PM To: Jacques Kruger; squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: Question on throughput -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 16/10/2014 12:36 a.m., Jacques Kruger wrote: > Thanks for the information. > > I'll do some further testing and confirm that the CPU isn't the > bottleneck in this case. The machine is a bit long in the tooth but > with the faster connection this could easily be the issue. > > As a general rule, am I correct in sticking with 2.7 for performance > or is the current focus on squid3? 2.7 was officially deprecated by 3.2. In both features and performance. Improvements will only be done on 3.x versions. Amos -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUPl8FAAoJELJo5wb/XPRjagEH/1kRT7+n2Cnoq33QXnytbuMM QkHRBaXZzeNrMQ8Jz+ofktjAo1H3fXn2Gp8yZ/uU1T8nHoJ1NfB2PfFH7ZDm1cc4 aWGkMH8xA2YfURWsdDCufGuqElfYTJjrgxhg68aq6XXeXBIWq5y+M4GbLlI0zq5C VI5HFjao2nm2qz+mf1Ba0XwHjR/JfNRDI/fSwpgVw8hLRFFhaHCL2ydHvWoDdeNk I58AdgCC/Aea4NYN/B08YaNDffjMlNZ12/PrS4/e2zPi9yPwN5ijv4Xn27woEOk7 Cwu3fQNST6tRPdXFE3c/k7Ty6eebcUK84btDiJOClz7rZiiqYYkIHdx+sl7KOwc= =xzIe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
