Search squid archive

Re: Monitoring bandwidth usage: good and bad news

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Eliezer,


What would expect from this monitoring tool to do?

Per-user and per-host bandwidth monitoring for both upload and download.

When using access log parsers like sarg and calamaris we get only download bandwidth. It's easy to configure them to generate a parallel set of upload reports from a parallel "access.log" that switches %<st to %>st but it looks like squid wont log upload sizes for CONNECT requests, so the big badwidth eaters like google drive won't show any upload traffic.

From "squidclient mgr:utilization" I could get only agregate upload and download bandwidth. Not per user or per host.

And of course I'd like to find something ready to use instead of hacking my own scripts to query squid, generate logs and plot graphics. ;-)

[]s, Fernando Lozano


Eliezer

On 07/15/2014 11:11 PM, fernando@xxxxxxxxxx.brwrote:

Hi there, As stated in another thread, using the access log format
">st" seems ineffective to measure upload bandwidth to things like
Google Drive. Amos stated that this could be related to a CONNECT
issue. Is anyone aware of this issue? Is there a bug report? Now the
good news: I'm collecting data from squidclient mgr:usage, and all
attributes client.*kbytes_in/out and the server ones seems to be
correct, and accounting for HTTPS downloads and uploads. Is anyone
aware of a ready-to-use monitoring tool that uses squidlcient for those
metrics? []s, Fernando Lozano




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Samba]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux USB]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux