Search squid archive

Re: memory_cache_shared no support for atomic operations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: memory_cache_shared no support for atomic operations
From: Marcus Kool <marcus.kool@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 10:27:48 -0300
Cc: squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <539630BB.50709@ngtech.co.il>
Organization: URLfilterDB
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0



On 06/09/2014 07:10 PM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:

On 06/10/2014 12:43 AM, Cassiano Martin wrote:

Yes its 32 bit custom built OS

As far as I can remember the shared memory needed 64bit OS and HW.
I am not 100% sure yet.

Eliezer


I am not sure but vaguely recall that it works on 32bit when
the number of workers is 1.

Marcus

References:
- memory_cache_shared no support for atomic operations
  - From: Cassiano Martin
- Re: memory_cache_shared no support for atomic operations
  - From: Eliezer Croitoru
- Re: memory_cache_shared no support for atomic operations
  - From: Eliezer Croitoru

Prev by Date: cache problem
Next by Date: Re: Squid 3.4.5 Centos RPMs is OUT.
Previous by thread: Re: memory_cache_shared no support for atomic operations
Next by thread: squid with qlproxy on fedora 20 not working for https traffic
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Audio Users] [Samba] [Big List of Linux Books] [Linux USB] [Yosemite News]

Powered by Linux