Hello, 1) PROXY2 is not configured to bump the traffic and I cannot remove it from the set up. 2) PROXY2 is listening on port 3128. I have to intercept proxy port because all the requests are going to PROXY2 on port 3128 and I have to bump it. Currently Client is connecting to PROXY2 and I cannot change configuration on PROXY2 to bump the traffic neither I can remove it from the netwrok setup. So is this all possible? Thanks, Jatin On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 11:24 PM, Antony Stone <Antony.Stone@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Saturday 07 June 2014 at 14:16, Jatin Bhasin wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> We have a test set up as below: >> >> Client <----> SQUID(PROXY1) <----> PROXY2 <-----> SERVER >> >> In the above set up Client browser is configured to point to PROXY2. >> So client sends the CONNECT request to PROXY2. >> >> PROXY1 which is running SQUID is transparently detecting this CONNECTION. > > 1. Why are you using transparent intercept when the client is configured to > connect to Proxy2? Why not just let the client connect, and have Proxy1 > ignore it? > > 2. What port number/s are you intercepting? You would normally use > transparent intercept on ports 80/443, for example, whereas a client-proxy > connection would be on 3128. Why intercept the proxy port, instead of just > the HTTP port? > >> The goal is that PROXY1 should bump the SSL connection between client >> and the PROXY2. > > What's the purpose of this? Why not just connect from the client to proxy2? > >> Hence, I believe that PROXY1 should send the CONNECT request to PROXY2 >> and then all the data transfers occurs between PROXY1 and PROXY2. >> PROXY1 should then bump the traffic and send it to client. >> >> Is this possible? Please suggest the SQUID(PROXY1) configuration >> settings to achieve this. > > Regards, > > > Antony. > > -- > "Black holes are where God divided by zero." > > - Steven Wright > > Please reply to the list; > please don't CC me.
